<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 570 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118849</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, affirming the disallowance of depreciation on the property not let out during the year, as the property was not used for business purposes. However, it permitted the deduction of society charges from the annual letting value, directing the AO to verify the payment, as these charges form part of the rent received. The decision was grounded in the specific facts and applicable legal provisions, ensuring compliance with the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 570 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118849</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, affirming the disallowance of depreciation on the property not let out during the year, as the property was not used for business purposes. However, it permitted the deduction of society charges from the annual letting value, directing the AO to verify the payment, as these charges form part of the rent received. The decision was grounded in the specific facts and applicable legal provisions, ensuring compliance with the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>