<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 569 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118848</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97 and allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 1997-98. It upheld that the hirers, not the assessee, were entitled to claim depreciation on assets under hire-purchase agreements, as ownership effectively passed to the hirers during the hire period based on possession and registration of the assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 12:32:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 569 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118848</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97 and allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 1997-98. It upheld that the hirers, not the assessee, were entitled to claim depreciation on assets under hire-purchase agreements, as ownership effectively passed to the hirers during the hire period based on possession and registration of the assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>