<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 562 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118846</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57Q(1) extends to components, spares and accessories used with eligible capital goods, even if those items are not themselves listed as capital goods. The decisive test is their use as parts of qualifying capital goods, not their own tariff classification. A Board circular of 2-12-96 supported this reading by clarifying that parts, components and accessories used with covered capital goods remain creditable notwithstanding their separate classification. On that basis, UV bulbs and set spring sprue bush were treated as admissible for credit when used with eligible capital goods, and denial of credit solely because they were not independently specified was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 12:28:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 562 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118846</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57Q(1) extends to components, spares and accessories used with eligible capital goods, even if those items are not themselves listed as capital goods. The decisive test is their use as parts of qualifying capital goods, not their own tariff classification. A Board circular of 2-12-96 supported this reading by clarifying that parts, components and accessories used with covered capital goods remain creditable notwithstanding their separate classification. On that basis, UV bulbs and set spring sprue bush were treated as admissible for credit when used with eligible capital goods, and denial of credit solely because they were not independently specified was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>