<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 559 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118843</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellants were ineligible for modvat credit due to using gate passes issued by non-existent firms. However, the penalty imposed on the appellants was set aside as there was no evidence that the cheque payments made were returned, resulting in the appeal being disposed of in favor of the appellant on this specific issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 12:17:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 559 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118843</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellants were ineligible for modvat credit due to using gate passes issued by non-existent firms. However, the penalty imposed on the appellants was set aside as there was no evidence that the cheque payments made were returned, resulting in the appeal being disposed of in favor of the appellant on this specific issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>