<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 554 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118838</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s grounds for statistical purposes for both assessment years 1997-98 and 1998-99, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and restoring the matter for a fresh decision. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes only, with the issue of the Annual Letting Value for the vacant property being restored to the CIT(A) and the ground regarding the long-term capital loss being rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 11:52:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 554 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118838</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s grounds for statistical purposes for both assessment years 1997-98 and 1998-99, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and restoring the matter for a fresh decision. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes only, with the issue of the Annual Letting Value for the vacant property being restored to the CIT(A) and the ground regarding the long-term capital loss being rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>