<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 550 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118834</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and remanding the matter back to the CIT(A) to decide the additions on merits, specifically whether the provisions of section 145 were rightly invoked by the AO and if the estimation made was proper. The Tribunal emphasized that an item of income can only be taxed once, either in block or regular assessment, and if finally assessed in block assessment, it cannot be considered in regular assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 11:44:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 550 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118834</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and remanding the matter back to the CIT(A) to decide the additions on merits, specifically whether the provisions of section 145 were rightly invoked by the AO and if the estimation made was proper. The Tribunal emphasized that an item of income can only be taxed once, either in block or regular assessment, and if finally assessed in block assessment, it cannot be considered in regular assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>