<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 540 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118824</link>
    <description>An apparent typographical mistake in an earlier order was corrected on the record, and the tariff classification was amended accordingly. The recorded error concerned the substitution of Heading 5404.10 with Heading 5402.10, and the correction was treated as necessary because the mistake was evident from the order itself. The operative effect was limited to rectifying the classification entry to reflect the intended tariff heading.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 11:17:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 540 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118824</link>
      <description>An apparent typographical mistake in an earlier order was corrected on the record, and the tariff classification was amended accordingly. The recorded error concerned the substitution of Heading 5404.10 with Heading 5402.10, and the correction was treated as necessary because the mistake was evident from the order itself. The operative effect was limited to rectifying the classification entry to reflect the intended tariff heading.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>