<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 530 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118814</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the transaction involving the purchase of printed cartons with specific specifications was a sale of goods, not a works contract, under section 194C of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the assessee was not required to deduct TDS, and the penalty under section 271C was not applicable. The Tribunal emphasized that taxes already paid should not be collected again, suggesting that any excess should be refunded. Both appeals by the assessee were allowed, and the application for additional evidence was rejected. The issue of refund was recommended for resolution in appropriate proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 530 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118814</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the transaction involving the purchase of printed cartons with specific specifications was a sale of goods, not a works contract, under section 194C of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the assessee was not required to deduct TDS, and the penalty under section 271C was not applicable. The Tribunal emphasized that taxes already paid should not be collected again, suggesting that any excess should be refunded. Both appeals by the assessee were allowed, and the application for additional evidence was rejected. The issue of refund was recommended for resolution in appropriate proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>