<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 527 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118811</link>
    <description>An employer&#039;s TDS obligations depend on making a fair and honest estimate of employee income, and bona fide treatment of reimbursements or allowances as non-taxable will not, by itself, make the employer an assessee in default when taxability is debatable. In such circumstances, recovery of short deduction under section 201 and interest under section 201(1A) is not justified merely because the revenue adopts a different view. The note also states that where the employer had filed the relevant TDS return and the competent authorities were authorised to act under Chapter XVII-B, a jurisdictional objection to survey, inquiry and order-making under the TDS provisions was unsupported.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 10:22:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 527 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118811</link>
      <description>An employer&#039;s TDS obligations depend on making a fair and honest estimate of employee income, and bona fide treatment of reimbursements or allowances as non-taxable will not, by itself, make the employer an assessee in default when taxability is debatable. In such circumstances, recovery of short deduction under section 201 and interest under section 201(1A) is not justified merely because the revenue adopts a different view. The note also states that where the employer had filed the relevant TDS return and the competent authorities were authorised to act under Chapter XVII-B, a jurisdictional objection to survey, inquiry and order-making under the TDS provisions was unsupported.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>