<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 518 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118802</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that penalties should not have been imposed for duty paid before the Show Cause Notice. The decision was based on the principle that penalties and interest are not applicable in such circumstances, as established by relevant legal precedents. The Tribunal emphasized the appellants&#039; good faith compliance and their status as a Small Scale Industry, overturning the additional penalties imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 18:05:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 518 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118802</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that penalties should not have been imposed for duty paid before the Show Cause Notice. The decision was based on the principle that penalties and interest are not applicable in such circumstances, as established by relevant legal precedents. The Tribunal emphasized the appellants&#039; good faith compliance and their status as a Small Scale Industry, overturning the additional penalties imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>