<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 556 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118787</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 8/97-C.E. for DTA clearances permitted under the EXIM Policy was treated as supporting a prima facie case for interim relief where the competent policy authority had already allowed the goods to be cleared. The departmental authorities were not shown to have prima facie authority under the notification to go behind that determination or to dispute the quantity permitted for clearance, so waiver of pre-deposit was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:09:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 556 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118787</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 8/97-C.E. for DTA clearances permitted under the EXIM Policy was treated as supporting a prima facie case for interim relief where the competent policy authority had already allowed the goods to be cleared. The departmental authorities were not shown to have prima facie authority under the notification to go behind that determination or to dispute the quantity permitted for clearance, so waiver of pre-deposit was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>