https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118752 The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's decision to demand Central Excise Duty from noticees not mentioned in the show cause notice. It was held that the Commissioner had exceeded the scope of the notice, and the noticees were not liable to pay duty. The decision clarified that the department could not demand duty from M/s. ATEL, resolving the appeal's main issue. en-us Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:46:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118752 The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's decision to demand Central Excise Duty from noticees not mentioned in the show cause notice. It was held that the Commissioner had exceeded the scope of the notice, and the noticees were not liable to pay duty. The decision clarified that the department could not demand duty from M/s. ATEL, resolving the appeal's main issue. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118752