<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 561 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118750</link>
    <description>Penalty under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 cannot rest on an undisclosed certificate or on material not put to notice, because reliance on such a document without opportunity to explain breaches natural justice. The certificate, issued at project level, did not show Board-level authorisation, knowledge, or conscious participation in evasion. Rule 209A also requires conscious dealing with goods liable to confiscation and a knowing concert with the evasion; on the record, no such basis for confiscability or culpable involvement was established. The penalty was therefore unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:43:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 561 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118750</link>
      <description>Penalty under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 cannot rest on an undisclosed certificate or on material not put to notice, because reliance on such a document without opportunity to explain breaches natural justice. The certificate, issued at project level, did not show Board-level authorisation, knowledge, or conscious participation in evasion. Rule 209A also requires conscious dealing with goods liable to confiscation and a knowing concert with the evasion; on the record, no such basis for confiscability or culpable involvement was established. The penalty was therefore unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>