<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 557 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118745</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling against the proposition of Related Person sale and demands based on MRP. It found that the companies involved did not meet the criteria for being considered as Related Persons under the Central Excise Act. Additionally, the Tribunal emphasized that the department, not the assessee, should be responsible for obtaining sale prices for valuation purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:37:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 557 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118745</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling against the proposition of Related Person sale and demands based on MRP. It found that the companies involved did not meet the criteria for being considered as Related Persons under the Central Excise Act. Additionally, the Tribunal emphasized that the department, not the assessee, should be responsible for obtaining sale prices for valuation purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>