<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 491 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118721</link>
    <description>The court set aside the penalties and confiscations imposed on the appellants due to insufficient evidence linking them to the alleged recovery of gold bars. The lack of concrete proof, discrepancies in statements, and failure to establish a clear connection to smuggling activities led to the decision in favor of the appellants. The court found the penalties and confiscations unjustified, granting consequential relief and overturning the initial orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 491 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118721</link>
      <description>The court set aside the penalties and confiscations imposed on the appellants due to insufficient evidence linking them to the alleged recovery of gold bars. The lack of concrete proof, discrepancies in statements, and failure to establish a clear connection to smuggling activities led to the decision in favor of the appellants. The court found the penalties and confiscations unjustified, granting consequential relief and overturning the initial orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>