<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 490 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118720</link>
    <description>Unutilised Cenvat credit of a predecessor cannot be claimed by a purchaser of a factory where the transfer deed shows possession was taken without assuming prior liabilities; a later undertaking inconsistent with the deed does not override its express terms, so denial of credit is justified. The penalty, however, was found excessive on the facts and was set aside, giving the assessee only partial relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:03:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 490 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118720</link>
      <description>Unutilised Cenvat credit of a predecessor cannot be claimed by a purchaser of a factory where the transfer deed shows possession was taken without assuming prior liabilities; a later undertaking inconsistent with the deed does not override its express terms, so denial of credit is justified. The penalty, however, was found excessive on the facts and was set aside, giving the assessee only partial relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>