https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118716 The appeal involved clandestine removal of goods without duty payment, resulting in duty demand, personal penalty, and confiscation of excess goods. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai confirmed the duty demand but set aside personal penalties citing legal precedents. The confiscation of excess goods was upheld due to evidence of intent to evade duty payment. A redemption fine for the confiscated goods was deemed reasonable and upheld. The duty and redemption fine were confirmed, while penalties on both appellants were annulled, concluding the appeals. en-us Tue, 24 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:47:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118716 The appeal involved clandestine removal of goods without duty payment, resulting in duty demand, personal penalty, and confiscation of excess goods. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai confirmed the duty demand but set aside personal penalties citing legal precedents. The confiscation of excess goods was upheld due to evidence of intent to evade duty payment. A redemption fine for the confiscated goods was deemed reasonable and upheld. The duty and redemption fine were confirmed, while penalties on both appellants were annulled, concluding the appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 24 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118716