<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 432 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118714</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the re-computation of perquisites and annual letting value, deleted the addition for unexplained jewelry, and upheld the surcharge levy. The block assessment order&#039;s validity was confirmed due to the assessee&#039;s procedural participation, leading to partial allowance of appeals for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:31:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 432 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118714</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the re-computation of perquisites and annual letting value, deleted the addition for unexplained jewelry, and upheld the surcharge levy. The block assessment order&#039;s validity was confirmed due to the assessee&#039;s procedural participation, leading to partial allowance of appeals for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>