<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 709 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118695</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, directing the lower authority to reconsider the case in light of the judgment regarding redemption of goods, indicating that absolute confiscation was not appropriate in this scenario. The matter was remanded to the Original Adjudicating Authority to determine the redemption fine and any penalty amount, ensuring principles of natural justice were followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 11:34:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 709 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118695</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, directing the lower authority to reconsider the case in light of the judgment regarding redemption of goods, indicating that absolute confiscation was not appropriate in this scenario. The matter was remanded to the Original Adjudicating Authority to determine the redemption fine and any penalty amount, ensuring principles of natural justice were followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>