<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 510 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), DELHI-II</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118687</link>
    <description>A micro processor based system used in manufacturing was held eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q because it formed part of the manufacturing setup, controlled the production process and ensured finished goods met required specifications. Applying the settled interpretation in Jawahar Mills Ltd., as affirmed by the Supreme Court, the deciding principle was that equipment used in or in relation to manufacture and having a functional nexus with the production process can qualify as capital goods. On that basis, the Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected and credit was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 10:59:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 510 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), DELHI-II</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118687</link>
      <description>A micro processor based system used in manufacturing was held eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q because it formed part of the manufacturing setup, controlled the production process and ensured finished goods met required specifications. Applying the settled interpretation in Jawahar Mills Ltd., as affirmed by the Supreme Court, the deciding principle was that equipment used in or in relation to manufacture and having a functional nexus with the production process can qualify as capital goods. On that basis, the Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected and credit was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>