https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118676 A mid-term anti-dumping review was found validly initiated where the request contained sufficient particulars and the authority could assess adequacy on available information; the absence of a questionnaire response did not vitiate the review. On merits, withdrawal of anti-dumping duty on imports from EU and Canada was justified because landed value exceeded the non-injurious price, producing a negative injury margin and no causal link with domestic industry injury. The record also showed consideration of injury parameters, recovery trends, and the absence of likely recurrence of injury. Duty on other countries was maintained, and the review notification and partial withdrawal were upheld. en-us Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jul 2012 18:44:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118676 A mid-term anti-dumping review was found validly initiated where the request contained sufficient particulars and the authority could assess adequacy on available information; the absence of a questionnaire response did not vitiate the review. On merits, withdrawal of anti-dumping duty on imports from EU and Canada was justified because landed value exceeded the non-injurious price, producing a negative injury margin and no causal link with domestic industry injury. The record also showed consideration of injury parameters, recovery trends, and the absence of likely recurrence of injury. Duty on other countries was maintained, and the review notification and partial withdrawal were upheld. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118676