<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 419 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118674</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, directing a fresh assessment by the Assessing Officer considering the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) provisions. The issue of interest under section 201(1A) was deemed consequential, dependent on the outcome of the withholding tax liability assessment under section 201(1) read with section 195.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 18:46:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 419 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118674</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, directing a fresh assessment by the Assessing Officer considering the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) provisions. The issue of interest under section 201(1A) was deemed consequential, dependent on the outcome of the withholding tax liability assessment under section 201(1) read with section 195.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>