<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 418 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118673</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, concluding that the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 10(14) for the additional conveyance allowance. The Tribunal found the allowance was spent wholly, necessarily, and exclusively in the performance of duties, deleting the addition of Rs. 2,13,016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 18:42:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 418 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118673</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, concluding that the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 10(14) for the additional conveyance allowance. The Tribunal found the allowance was spent wholly, necessarily, and exclusively in the performance of duties, deleting the addition of Rs. 2,13,016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>