<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 321 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118655</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that liquidated damages deducted for delayed delivery should be treated as compensation, not a penalty, under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction value should reflect the reduced price after deducting liquidated damages, thereby granting the appellant relief and clarifying the treatment of such deductions in excise duty calculations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 321 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118655</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that liquidated damages deducted for delayed delivery should be treated as compensation, not a penalty, under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction value should reflect the reduced price after deducting liquidated damages, thereby granting the appellant relief and clarifying the treatment of such deductions in excise duty calculations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>