<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 386 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118645</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the benefit under section 54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is not applicable for a residential house purchased or constructed outside India. The tribunal also remanded the issue concerning the tax rate on interest income under the Double Tax Avoidance Agreement with the USA back to the CIT(A) for further adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 15:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 386 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118645</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the benefit under section 54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is not applicable for a residential house purchased or constructed outside India. The tribunal also remanded the issue concerning the tax rate on interest income under the Double Tax Avoidance Agreement with the USA back to the CIT(A) for further adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>