https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118633 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming a demand of Rs. 1,25,710 due to a shortage of finished goods after a burglary. Emphasizing procedural correctness, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority to first decide on the remission application, which had not been considered before issuing the show cause notice. The appellant was directed to provide complete details of the missing goods to aid in the remission application's disposal. The appeal was allowed for procedural rectification. en-us Fri, 01 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:47:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118633 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming a demand of Rs. 1,25,710 due to a shortage of finished goods after a burglary. Emphasizing procedural correctness, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority to first decide on the remission application, which had not been considered before issuing the show cause notice. The appellant was directed to provide complete details of the missing goods to aid in the remission application's disposal. The appeal was allowed for procedural rectification. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 01 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118633