<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 380 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118624</link>
    <description>Municipal tax paid by a co-owner-assessee under an occupancy arrangement with the other co-owners was treated as part of the consideration for business use of the premises and could qualify as rent under section 30. The payment was not invalid merely because the property was jointly owned, since one co-owner was permitted to occupy and use the premises under agreement. Independently, the same outgo was also allowable as business expenditure under section 37 because it was incurred for the purposes of the business. The disallowance was therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 15:38:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 380 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118624</link>
      <description>Municipal tax paid by a co-owner-assessee under an occupancy arrangement with the other co-owners was treated as part of the consideration for business use of the premises and could qualify as rent under section 30. The payment was not invalid merely because the property was jointly owned, since one co-owner was permitted to occupy and use the premises under agreement. Independently, the same outgo was also allowable as business expenditure under section 37 because it was incurred for the purposes of the business. The disallowance was therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>