<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 379 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118621</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the addition related to the sale of shares of Nistha Finance and Investment (India) Ltd. However, the addition related to the sale of shares of Chirau Finance Investment &amp;amp; Leasing Co. Ltd. was upheld as the transactions were not substantiated, and funds were routed through a bogus account. The Tribunal stressed the importance of providing credible evidence and the burden of proof on the assessee to explain the source of funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 15:28:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 379 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118621</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the addition related to the sale of shares of Nistha Finance and Investment (India) Ltd. However, the addition related to the sale of shares of Chirau Finance Investment &amp;amp; Leasing Co. Ltd. was upheld as the transactions were not substantiated, and funds were routed through a bogus account. The Tribunal stressed the importance of providing credible evidence and the burden of proof on the assessee to explain the source of funds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>