<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 372 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118616</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand of Rs. 75,03,406/- under Sections 28 and 72 of the Customs Act. It held that the imported raw materials used for manufacturing hulls qualified for duty exemption under notification 16/2000-Cus, as the hulls were considered vessels under Customs Tariff Heading 89.06. The Tribunal emphasized the fulfillment of license conditions for exemption eligibility and rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding the license period and intended use of materials. The impugned order was overturned, and the appeal was granted in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 15:10:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 372 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118616</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand of Rs. 75,03,406/- under Sections 28 and 72 of the Customs Act. It held that the imported raw materials used for manufacturing hulls qualified for duty exemption under notification 16/2000-Cus, as the hulls were considered vessels under Customs Tariff Heading 89.06. The Tribunal emphasized the fulfillment of license conditions for exemption eligibility and rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding the license period and intended use of materials. The impugned order was overturned, and the appeal was granted in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>