<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 370 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118612</link>
    <description>The court found in favor of the petitioners on all issues. It held that the deponent of the supporting affidavit was duly authorized, affirmed its territorial jurisdiction, declared the notification dated 4-7-2006 invalid due to its retrospective effect, and acknowledged the petitioners&#039; entitlement to proceed with exports pending government decision. The court directed the government to promptly consider the petitioners&#039; request under the Foreign Trade Policy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 370 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118612</link>
      <description>The court found in favor of the petitioners on all issues. It held that the deponent of the supporting affidavit was duly authorized, affirmed its territorial jurisdiction, declared the notification dated 4-7-2006 invalid due to its retrospective effect, and acknowledged the petitioners&#039; entitlement to proceed with exports pending government decision. The court directed the government to promptly consider the petitioners&#039; request under the Foreign Trade Policy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>