<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 361 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118599</link>
    <description>Imported mobile phone parts and accessories were held eligible for exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus because the notification expressly covered parts, components and accessories of mobile handsets under the specified heading or any other chapter. Rule 2(a) of the General Rules of Interpretation could not be invoked to deny the exemption by deeming the goods to be complete mobile phones in semi-knocked down form. The tribunal also relied on Board circulars and prior authority to treat the goods as presented for exemption purposes. The demand, confiscation and penalty based on denial of the exemption were therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 361 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118599</link>
      <description>Imported mobile phone parts and accessories were held eligible for exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus because the notification expressly covered parts, components and accessories of mobile handsets under the specified heading or any other chapter. Rule 2(a) of the General Rules of Interpretation could not be invoked to deny the exemption by deeming the goods to be complete mobile phones in semi-knocked down form. The tribunal also relied on Board circulars and prior authority to treat the goods as presented for exemption purposes. The demand, confiscation and penalty based on denial of the exemption were therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>