<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 369 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118594</link>
    <description>A payment made to settle a dispute arising from breach of a commercial underwriting obligation was treated as a business loss and not as a speculative transaction or prohibited expenditure, because it flowed from non-performance of a regular business contract. A notional diminution in the value of devolved securities, based only on valuation and not on any actual trading transaction, was held outside the speculative loss provisions but was still not deductible as a loss. A general ad hoc disallowance of expenses for want of vouchers was sent back for fresh verification after the assessee was given an opportunity to produce evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 13:45:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 369 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118594</link>
      <description>A payment made to settle a dispute arising from breach of a commercial underwriting obligation was treated as a business loss and not as a speculative transaction or prohibited expenditure, because it flowed from non-performance of a regular business contract. A notional diminution in the value of devolved securities, based only on valuation and not on any actual trading transaction, was held outside the speculative loss provisions but was still not deductible as a loss. A general ad hoc disallowance of expenses for want of vouchers was sent back for fresh verification after the assessee was given an opportunity to produce evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>