<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 409 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118561</link>
    <description>Promotional packs cleared without declaration of MRP and marked free or not for sale were considered in a dispute over assessment under Section 4 or Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal noted that earlier decisions treating similar packs as assessable under Section 4 supported the appellants, and on that basis found a prima facie case for interim relief. Pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 12:01:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 409 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118561</link>
      <description>Promotional packs cleared without declaration of MRP and marked free or not for sale were considered in a dispute over assessment under Section 4 or Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal noted that earlier decisions treating similar packs as assessable under Section 4 supported the appellants, and on that basis found a prima facie case for interim relief. Pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>