<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 408 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118560</link>
    <description>Goods imported under the DEPB Scheme were treated as eligible for exemption from Special Additional Duty under Notification No. 34/98-Cus., because that notification operated on its own terms and expressly covered goods imported under Notification No. 34/97-Cus. The conditions attached to Notification No. 34/97-Cus. could not be read into the later SAD exemption notification unless expressly incorporated. Subsequent notifications, including Notifications No. 48/98-Cus. and No. 56/98-Cus., reinforced that such goods were not liable to SAD. The demand to debit Special Additional Duty in the DEPB was therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 11:58:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 408 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118560</link>
      <description>Goods imported under the DEPB Scheme were treated as eligible for exemption from Special Additional Duty under Notification No. 34/98-Cus., because that notification operated on its own terms and expressly covered goods imported under Notification No. 34/97-Cus. The conditions attached to Notification No. 34/97-Cus. could not be read into the later SAD exemption notification unless expressly incorporated. Subsequent notifications, including Notifications No. 48/98-Cus. and No. 56/98-Cus., reinforced that such goods were not liable to SAD. The demand to debit Special Additional Duty in the DEPB was therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>