<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 303 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118558</link>
    <description>Revenue must prove clandestine manufacture and removal by reliable evidence; unverified procurement records and LAB consumption alone were insufficient to establish clandestine clearances of acid slurry, so the allegation failed. The brand-name objection under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. also failed because Jaya Soap Works had not lost SSI eligibility on account of any clandestine removals; accordingly, detergent clearances bearing that brand name remained entitled to exemption, and the assessee retained the benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 11:55:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 303 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118558</link>
      <description>Revenue must prove clandestine manufacture and removal by reliable evidence; unverified procurement records and LAB consumption alone were insufficient to establish clandestine clearances of acid slurry, so the allegation failed. The brand-name objection under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. also failed because Jaya Soap Works had not lost SSI eligibility on account of any clandestine removals; accordingly, detergent clearances bearing that brand name remained entitled to exemption, and the assessee retained the benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>