<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 325 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118548</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a case concerning duty liability for cotton yarn cleared on cones post-exemption withdrawal. The Tribunal set aside the order reducing the duty demand, reinstating the original duty amount. The decision highlighted the necessity of concrete evidence in revising duty calculations and emphasized the importance of accurate documentation in tax-related disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 11:35:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 325 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118548</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a case concerning duty liability for cotton yarn cleared on cones post-exemption withdrawal. The Tribunal set aside the order reducing the duty demand, reinstating the original duty amount. The decision highlighted the necessity of concrete evidence in revising duty calculations and emphasized the importance of accurate documentation in tax-related disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>