<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 324 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118547</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the order reducing the duty demand and restoring the original duty amount. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of substantial evidence supporting the revised calculation accepted by the Commissioner (Appeals), highlighting the importance of concrete evidence in duty calculations. The respondents&#039; claim of a lesser quantity of yarn cleared on cones was not adequately supported, leading to the reversal of the duty reduction. The case underscores the necessity of providing solid evidence in challenging duty demands to avoid unwarranted reductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 11:01:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 324 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118547</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the order reducing the duty demand and restoring the original duty amount. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of substantial evidence supporting the revised calculation accepted by the Commissioner (Appeals), highlighting the importance of concrete evidence in duty calculations. The respondents&#039; claim of a lesser quantity of yarn cleared on cones was not adequately supported, leading to the reversal of the duty reduction. The case underscores the necessity of providing solid evidence in challenging duty demands to avoid unwarranted reductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>