<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 457 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118544</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, deleting the additions of Rs. 1,41,08,484, Rs. 6,61,063, and Rs. 2,00,000, citing lack of evidence and reliance on presumption by the AO. It directed the AO to grant the benefit of section 54E for the flat purchase, acknowledging the genuineness of transactions and supporting documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 09:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 457 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118544</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, deleting the additions of Rs. 1,41,08,484, Rs. 6,61,063, and Rs. 2,00,000, citing lack of evidence and reliance on presumption by the AO. It directed the AO to grant the benefit of section 54E for the flat purchase, acknowledging the genuineness of transactions and supporting documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>