<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 565 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118535</link>
    <description>Go-down dunnage flooring was treated as a predominantly jute-based product, because its essential function and trade identity flowed from hessian and jute, not from the plastic lamination used on both sides. On that basis, classification under Heading 3918 as an article of plastic was rejected, and the textile-fabric classification was preferred. Applying commercial parlance and predominant character principles, the lamination was held to enhance utility without changing the product&#039;s essential identity. The exemption notifications for rot-proofed and laminated jute products then supported the assessee&#039;s claim, so the duty demand and penalties were held unsustainable and the classification order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 10:31:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 565 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118535</link>
      <description>Go-down dunnage flooring was treated as a predominantly jute-based product, because its essential function and trade identity flowed from hessian and jute, not from the plastic lamination used on both sides. On that basis, classification under Heading 3918 as an article of plastic was rejected, and the textile-fabric classification was preferred. Applying commercial parlance and predominant character principles, the lamination was held to enhance utility without changing the product&#039;s essential identity. The exemption notifications for rot-proofed and laminated jute products then supported the assessee&#039;s claim, so the duty demand and penalties were held unsustainable and the classification order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>