https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118531 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai set aside the impugned order regarding valuation determination under the Central Excise Act for sachets of Shampoo. Disagreeing with the Commissioner's valuation differentiation, the Tribunal followed the Bombay High Court order and a Larger Bench decision, emphasizing adherence to legal precedents. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the importance of consistency and judicial discipline in valuation matters, directing the order to be reviewed for assessing the adjudicator's legal knowledge and discipline. en-us Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jul 2012 10:27:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118531 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai set aside the impugned order regarding valuation determination under the Central Excise Act for sachets of Shampoo. Disagreeing with the Commissioner's valuation differentiation, the Tribunal followed the Bombay High Court order and a Larger Bench decision, emphasizing adherence to legal precedents. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the importance of consistency and judicial discipline in valuation matters, directing the order to be reviewed for assessing the adjudicator's legal knowledge and discipline. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118531