<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 450 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118529</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision to treat horse breeding and horse racing activities as connected, denying the assessee&#039;s claim to separate the activities for tax purposes under Section 74A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal relied on the Calcutta High Court precedent, emphasizing that losses from owning and maintaining racehorses should be carried forward and set off against income from the same source, ultimately ruling against the assessee&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 18:45:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 450 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118529</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision to treat horse breeding and horse racing activities as connected, denying the assessee&#039;s claim to separate the activities for tax purposes under Section 74A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal relied on the Calcutta High Court precedent, emphasizing that losses from owning and maintaining racehorses should be carried forward and set off against income from the same source, ultimately ruling against the assessee&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>