<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 475 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118524</link>
    <description>The ITAT resolved the case by deleting the additions made for low household withdrawals, siding with the Judicial Member&#039;s view that the estimates were speculative and unsupported by evidence. However, the Tribunal did not impose costs on the Revenue, agreeing with the Accountant Member that the appeal was bona fide and not frivolous, reflecting a legitimate difference in opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 475 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118524</link>
      <description>The ITAT resolved the case by deleting the additions made for low household withdrawals, siding with the Judicial Member&#039;s view that the estimates were speculative and unsupported by evidence. However, the Tribunal did not impose costs on the Revenue, agreeing with the Accountant Member that the appeal was bona fide and not frivolous, reflecting a legitimate difference in opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>