<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 510 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118496</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowing the assessee&#039;s deduction claim for lease rent paid. The Tribunal found the transactions genuine, supported by evidence, and conducted at market value, not intended to defraud revenue. The CIT(A)&#039;s findings were deemed valid, emphasizing the legitimacy of sale and lease back transactions as recognized finance methods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 11:44:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 510 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118496</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowing the assessee&#039;s deduction claim for lease rent paid. The Tribunal found the transactions genuine, supported by evidence, and conducted at market value, not intended to defraud revenue. The CIT(A)&#039;s findings were deemed valid, emphasizing the legitimacy of sale and lease back transactions as recognized finance methods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>