<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 507 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118493</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee-company, overturning the disallowance of depreciation on leased assets. It held that the transactions were genuine business transactions, satisfying the conditions for claiming depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had established the purchase and lease of the assets, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the depreciation claims on the leased assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 11:11:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 507 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118493</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee-company, overturning the disallowance of depreciation on leased assets. It held that the transactions were genuine business transactions, satisfying the conditions for claiming depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had established the purchase and lease of the assets, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the depreciation claims on the leased assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>