<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 505 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118491</link>
    <description>Departmental circulars fixing monetary limits for filing and pursuing revenue appeals apply to pending appeals as well when the tax effect falls below the prescribed threshold. The Tribunal noted that the revised limit of Rs. 2 lakhs was intended to reduce litigation and treated that instruction as governing the appeals already before it. On that basis, the revenue appeals, each involving tax effect below the threshold, were held not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:35:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 505 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118491</link>
      <description>Departmental circulars fixing monetary limits for filing and pursuing revenue appeals apply to pending appeals as well when the tax effect falls below the prescribed threshold. The Tribunal noted that the revised limit of Rs. 2 lakhs was intended to reduce litigation and treated that instruction as governing the appeals already before it. On that basis, the revenue appeals, each involving tax effect below the threshold, were held not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>