<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 499 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118482</link>
    <description>Share transfers supported by contemporaneous books, partner account entries, balance-sheet reflection and market pricing were treated as genuine, and the loss on transfer of the NOCIL and M. Werlingdon shares was allowed. The fact that the shares remained pledged and were not immediately re-registered did not, by itself, make the transactions sham. The character of the receipt on transfer of Gujarat Gas Company shares was left for fresh examination because the record was incomplete on whether the sale was completed under the earlier or later agreement and whether any component was true interest. The disallowance of interest expenditure was also restored for verification of the source and utilisation of funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 18:43:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 499 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118482</link>
      <description>Share transfers supported by contemporaneous books, partner account entries, balance-sheet reflection and market pricing were treated as genuine, and the loss on transfer of the NOCIL and M. Werlingdon shares was allowed. The fact that the shares remained pledged and were not immediately re-registered did not, by itself, make the transactions sham. The character of the receipt on transfer of Gujarat Gas Company shares was left for fresh examination because the record was incomplete on whether the sale was completed under the earlier or later agreement and whether any component was true interest. The disallowance of interest expenditure was also restored for verification of the source and utilisation of funds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>