<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 347 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118476</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Original Authority to reassess the classification of imported items under the Customs Tariff Act. The Original Authority was directed to determine whether the added vitamins were within permissible limits and whether the compounding process affected the classification under Chapter 20 and Chapter 21. Both parties were allowed to present fresh evidence to support their claims, and the appeal was allowed by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 18:29:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 347 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118476</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Original Authority to reassess the classification of imported items under the Customs Tariff Act. The Original Authority was directed to determine whether the added vitamins were within permissible limits and whether the compounding process affected the classification under Chapter 20 and Chapter 21. Both parties were allowed to present fresh evidence to support their claims, and the appeal was allowed by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>