<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 494 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118472</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) disallowing interest expenditure of Rs. 3,25,25,750 for the assessment year 1997-98. It was found that the borrowed funds were not utilized for the assessee&#039;s business purposes but were diverted to a sister concern. The Tribunal concluded that the interest-free loan to the sister concern was not for the business objectives of the assessee, leading to the rejection of the appeal on the disallowance of interest expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 18:14:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 494 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118472</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) disallowing interest expenditure of Rs. 3,25,25,750 for the assessment year 1997-98. It was found that the borrowed funds were not utilized for the assessee&#039;s business purposes but were diverted to a sister concern. The Tribunal concluded that the interest-free loan to the sister concern was not for the business objectives of the assessee, leading to the rejection of the appeal on the disallowance of interest expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>