https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118461 The appellate tribunal overturned the demand, penalty, and confiscation related to alleged shortages in final products, noting the lack of concrete evidence and attributing the discrepancies to processing loss. The tribunal also dismissed the confiscation of goods and duty demand, emphasizing the absence of proof of intended clandestine removal. No penalty was imposed on the appellants as there was insufficient evidence to support clandestine removal allegations. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellants due to the lack of substantial evidence supporting the revenue's claims. en-us Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jun 2012 17:46:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118461 The appellate tribunal overturned the demand, penalty, and confiscation related to alleged shortages in final products, noting the lack of concrete evidence and attributing the discrepancies to processing loss. The tribunal also dismissed the confiscation of goods and duty demand, emphasizing the absence of proof of intended clandestine removal. No penalty was imposed on the appellants as there was insufficient evidence to support clandestine removal allegations. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellants due to the lack of substantial evidence supporting the revenue's claims. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118461