<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 338 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118460</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, allowing the respondent&#039;s appeal. The respondent correctly availed Modvat credit and was entitled to take suo motu credit for the excess rebate payment made twice to the Government. The judgment emphasized the prohibition on revenue retention of undue amounts, leading to the denial of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 17:44:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 338 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118460</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, allowing the respondent&#039;s appeal. The respondent correctly availed Modvat credit and was entitled to take suo motu credit for the excess rebate payment made twice to the Government. The judgment emphasized the prohibition on revenue retention of undue amounts, leading to the denial of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>